Article

Coarctation: A Review

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Abstract

Coarctation of the aorta occurs in 0.04% of the population, and accounts for approximately 10% of lesions in adults with congenital heart disease. It can occur as an isolated lesion or as a part of a complex defect, and is most commonly associated with bicuspid aortic valve, ventricular septal defect, and mitral valve abnormalities. Since the first surgical repair in 1944, the available treatment options have expanded greatly. Perhaps one of the most important advances in the management of coarctation of the aorta has been the development of transcatheter therapy for both native and especially recurrent coarctation of the aorta. Late complications, even after apparently successful treatment, are not uncommon. For this reason, lifelong follow-up is vital.

Disclosure:Financial support for this study was provided by Division of Cardiovascular Medicine funds University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Received:

Accepted:

Correspondence Details:Marc G Cribbs, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1700 6th Avenue South, Suite 9100, Birmingham, AL 35233, US. E: mgcribbs@uabmc.edu

Copyright Statement:

The copyright in this work belongs to Radcliffe Medical Media. Only articles clearly marked with the CC BY-NC logo are published with the Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. The CC BY-NC option was not available for Radcliffe journals before 1 January 2019. Articles marked ‘Open Access’ but not marked ‘CC BY-NC’ are made freely accessible at the time of publication but are subject to standard copyright law regarding reproduction and distribution. Permission is required for reuse of this content.

The incidence of congenital heart disease (CHD) is slightly less than 1% of all live births.1 With extensive medical and surgical innovation over the past 50 years, and the high-quality care received in childhood, 85–90% of children with CHD in the US survive into adulthood. As a result, the number of adults with congenital heart defects in the US now exceeds 1 million, with a projected continued growth rate of 5% per year.1,2 Coarctation of the aorta (CoA), considered a moderately complex form of CHD, was first described by Morgagni in 1760.3 It occurs in approximately 0.04% of the population, and accounts for approximately 5% of all congenital heart defects.4 It makes up approximately 10% of lesions in adults with CHD (ACHD), and occurs twofold to fivefold more often in men than in women.5

CoA can occur as an isolated lesion or as a part of a complex defect in the presence of other intracardiac lesions. Most commonly, this includes bicuspid aortic valve (≤85%), mitral valve abnormalities, or ventricular septal defects. Others include transposition of the great arteries, Taussig–Bing anomaly, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Patients with Turner’s, Noonan’s, and Williams–Beuren syndromes can have CoA, and various gene deletions have been described. One such gene mutation involves the NOTCH1 gene.6-10

Morphology

The morphology of CoA is a spectrum, and varies widely based on the age at presentation. For example, transverse arch and isthmus hypoplasia is most commonly seen in the newborn period, whereas discrete localized stenosis or membrane-like obstruction just beyond the left subclavian artery is more often encountered in older children and adults.11,12 More unusual locations include the ascending aorta and abdominal aorta. The etiology of CoA remains unclear. The primary mechanism is thought to be medial thickening and intimal hyperplasia that leads to the formation of a posterolateral ridge that encircles the aortic lumen, resulting in the CoA segment. Another theory is that of aberrant ductal tissue and abnormal intrauterine blood flow through the aortic arch.8,9

Presentation

Although most cases of CoA are diagnosed in infancy, some patients may not present until later childhood, adolescence, or adulthood (Figure 1). The age at presentation is primarily dependent upon the degree of stenosis across the coarcted segment. For example, severe CoA can lead to heart failure and shock upon closure of the ductus arteriosus in infancy.13 Milder forms, in contrast, may not be detected until the patient is much older.

Patients with extensive collateral vessels that bypass the area of CoA can remain asymptomatic for many years.14,15 Indeed, although the natural history of untreated CoA is associated with a mean life expectancy of approximately 35 years, there are reports of untreated patients living to 92 years.16 The most common presenting finding is systemic hypertension measured in the upper extremities. Others can include cardiac failure or endocarditis.10,11,17 Older patients may complain of symptoms, such as headache, dizziness, tinnitus, abdominal angina, and exertional leg fatigue.

Coarctation Magnetic Resonance Image

Article image

Management

Several treatment options for CoA are now available, and include both surgical and transcatheter interventions. The decision on the optimal treatment method can be complicated, and there is no evidence-based standard of care. In general, management is guided by the age at presentation, and the complexity of the coarctation and/or associated defects.

Surgical Intervention

The first surgical repair of CoA was performed in 1944 by Crafoord and Nylin.18 Over the ensuing 40 years, refinement in surgical techniques expanded the available surgical options and included patch augmentation, end-to-end anastomosis, and even the insertion of a Gore-Tex bypass graft with more complex anatomy.12 Another surgical approach was the subclavian flap, whereby augmentation of the coarcted segment was performed using the subclavian artery as a surgical flap.19 Today, the surgical risk is estimated to be <1% in patients with simple CoA, and surgery remains the preferred method of treatment in infants. In the critically ill infant, older child, or adolescent, however, a less invasive method employing transcatheter treatment is often favored.20–22 This is particularly true after the third or fourth decade of life, when intraoperative morbidity and mortality increases as a result of degenerative aortic wall changes and comorbid conditions, such as systemic hypertension, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. Complications from coarctation surgery can include spinal cord damage, pleural effusions, phrenic, or laryngeal nerve paralysis, paradoxical hypertension, and infection.23 As a result, such older patients are often best managed by non-surgical approaches.

Transcatheter Treatment

Transcatheter treatment of CoA became popular with the advent of balloon angioplasty by Lock et al. in 1983.24 In fact, for patients aged >4 years or weighing >15 kg, transcatheter therapy for both native and especially recurrent CoA has become the standard of care in the majority of institutions.25 Guidelines published in 2011 by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association for transcatheter treatment for primary and recurrent CoA further allowed for balloon angioplasty and/or stenting when a peak-to-peak gradient of ≥20 mmHg at the time of cardiac catheterization was evident. It should be noted, however, that interventions may be warranted with less severe gradients if there is systemic hypertension with imaging evidence of a significant narrowing.20

Balloon Angioplasty

Successful relief of stenosis by balloon angioplasty is accomplished by damage to the aortic intima and media, the degree of which is often difficult to control. The major drawbacks are recoil of the vessel with recurrence of stenosis and vascular injury with consequent vessel dissection or aneurysm formation.26 In addition, elastic fiber fragmentation, underlying fibrosis, cystic medial necrosis, and vascular calcification may predispose patients to dissection, aneurysm formation, or even rupture at the time of repair.12,27

Bare Metal Stent Placement

Intravascular bare metal stent placement was first performed by O’Laughlin et al. in 1993 and, at many centers, became the treatment of choice for children and adults with native CoA.28 The goal of using bare metal stents was to avoid dissection, excessive dilation, and elastic recoil of the aorta. It was also believed to result in less vascular injury than balloon angioplasty alone.29

In a study comparing surgical repair, balloon angioplasty, and stent treatment of native CoA in children, stented patients had significantly lower acute complications compared with those who had undergone surgical or balloon angioplasty repair.30 Bare metal stents were also shown to be more effective at achieving acute and sustained reductions in blood pressure gradients. As a result, stent therapy for CoA became the preferred intervention over balloon angioplasty for older children and adults.31 Nevertheless, although rare, complications such as aneurysm formation, stent malposition, vascular complications, death, and the need for emergency surgery can occur.32,33

Covered Stent Placement

To this end, perhaps one of the most important advances in the management of CoA has been the development of covered stent technology (Figure 2). First used in 1999 to treat coexistent CoA and aneurysm of the aorta in a young man, it has since been used in a variety of settings, and an array of covered stents have become available for clinical use.34,35 Indications for the use of covered stents are now wide-ranging and continue to expand. In CoA patients, they are preferentially deployed in a number of situations, including the treatment of associated aneurysms, native CoA with near-interruption, associated patent ductus arteriosus, and in older patients due to the potential for aortic disruption (Figure 1).36,37 In addition, where exclusion of the left subclavian artery is anticipated, wire perforation of the covered stent followed by balloon angioplasty through a stent cell has allowed for a recannulized vessel.38

Covered stents can also be used as a rescue treatment in patients with stent complications and in patients with complex CoA anatomy. Potential physiological benefits following stenting include mid-term left ventricular mass regression, ventricular function improvement, and improvement in central aortic function with reduction of daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure such that anti-hypertensive medication can often be discontinued.39,40 Follow-up with CT examination suggests that the overall development of aneurysms continues to be low.36,41–44 Despite all the potential advantages seen with covered stents, aggressive surveillance remains necessary to screen for long-term complications.

Long-term Complications

While symptoms and survival are improved after surgical or transcatheter intervention, the long-term survival of CoA patients continues to be lower than in the general population.10 Late complications can include systemic hypertension, recurrent CoA, aneurysm formation at the site of previous repair, early coronary artery disease, and intracranial aneurysm.

Systemic hypertension, even after excellent repair, remains common, and can lead to stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. The estimated prevalence ranges from 25% to 68%, and is especially common in patients with concomitant aortic arch hypoplasia or in patients who underwent repair at a later age.45 It is believed that systemic hypertension results from increased aortic stiffness, decreased baroreceptor sensitivity, raised plasma concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine, or coexisting essential hypertension.46,47 Another factor may be a hypoplastic aortic arch that was not corrected at the time of initial treatment. As hypertension may not be evident at rest or during the routine clinic visit, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and exercise testing to evaluate for exercise-induced hypertension are often employed.48

Even in the absence of early complications with good initial relief of obstruction, recurrent CoA and aneurysm formation at the site of coarctation repair are seen. Recoarctation at the site of previous repair or residual coarctation are important causes of morbidity, as it can lead to worsening systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease, or systolic and diastolic heart failure. Studies have found the rate of recoarctation to be between 3% and 15%.16,49–51

While recoarctation or residual stenosis may occur with all surgical techniques, a study by Choudary et al. demonstrated a lower rate of significant recoarctation with the end-to-end anastomosis repair.52 Indeed, the extended end-to-end anastomosis is typically preferred, as it allows resection of the coarctation while avoiding prosthetic material and is less prone to restenosis.20

Aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm formation, both of the ascending aorta and in the region of the aortic isthmus, if left untreated, can lead to rupture with rates up to 100% within 15 years.19 The incidence of early and late aneurysm formation after balloon angioplasty has been reported to be between 5% and 11.5%.29,53 It is felt that associated bicuspid aortic valve, aortic wall changes, and systemic hypertension are largely responsible for aneurysm formation in the ascending aorta.54

Coarctation Angiogram with Stent

Article image

Aneurysm formation at the region of the aortic isthmus does not appear to be related to the presence of an intimal tear at the time of the initial procedure and, indeed, the majority of aneurysms tend to be small and discrete. Still, intervention is required for late aneurysm formation in patients after balloon dilation of native recurrent CoA.55 As with recoarctation, most surgical types carry a risk of aneurysm formation. It is felt, however, that the end-to-end anastomosis repair may carry the lowest risk.52 Because of the risk of recoarctation, residual stenosis, and aneurysm formation, all patients need careful follow-up after coarctation repair. While evidence of recoarctation may be detected by a clinical examination and echocardiography (Figure 3AC), cardiac MRI (CMR) (Figure 1) or CT angiography (CTA) (Figure 4) are recommended to evaluate for aneurysm and/or pseudoaneurysm formation.56

Early coronary artery disease (CAD) is also described.12,57,58 The etiology of CAD is not well understood, but thought to be related to long-standing hypertension. In a study from the Mayo Clinic, CAD was the most common cause of late postoperative death.59 A Canadian study later found that CoA was not a sole predictor for the development of coronary artery disease, and called into question the prevalence of CAD in patients with a history of CoA.60

Coarctation Echocardiogram and Angiogram

Article image

Finally, there is an association of CoA and extracardiac lesions, mainly intracranial aneurysms (i.e. berry aneurysm of the circle of Willis) in up to 10% of patients.10 The reason for this is not clear, but might be a consequence of e has been found to be a risk factor.61 Aneurysm size tends to increase with age, and uncontrolled hypertension increases the risk of rupture.62 Given this, screening for cerebrovascular aneurysms is recommended.56 It should be noted, however, that routine screening for aneurysms remains a matter of debate amongst some practitioners.63

Coarctation CT Image

Article image

Follow-up Assessment

Whether the patient has undergone a surgical or transcatheter treatment, follow-up care is required such that long-term complications can be identified and treated. The type and frequency of testing is largely guided by symptoms and the clinical examination, although often includes additional testing to evaluate for issues that may not be evident by physical findings or echocardiography alone. Resting blood pressure, measured in the upper and lower extremities, is important, as a systolic blood pressure discrepancy along with a delay between the brachial to femoral pulses and/or vascular murmur heard between the scapulae could hint toward recoarctation or residual stenosis.13,64 As hypertension may not be evident at rest or during the routine clinic visit, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and exercise testing to evaluate for exercise-induced hypertension are often employed.48

Electrocardiography may demonstrate left atrial or ventricular pressure load or left ventricular strain. Chest radiography, while non-specific in the young patient, may demonstrate the ‘figure of 3’ sign beneath the aortic knob, which is characteristic of native or recoarctation. Rib notching due to dilated intercostal arteries may also be present in older patients.22,65 Given the widespread availability and ease of use, the mainstay of the imaging evaluation remains the echocardiogram (Figure 3A and 3B). From the suprasternal notch view, the anatomy of the site of CoA is often well visualized, and a mean Doppler gradient >20 mmHg or mean Doppler gradient >10 mmHg in the setting of left ventricular systolic dysfunction or aortic valve regurgitation suggests that intervention may be necessary.48,66,67 To further delineate the anatomy, the echocardiographic evaluation should be coupled with advanced imaging, such as CMR or CTA (Figure 4). Indeed, CMR and CTA have become the preferred non-invasive means to evaluate coarctation before and after operative and transcatheter treatment in adults. This is particularly important to evaluate for the presence of aneurysm and/or pseudoaneurysm formation. At cardiac catheterization, a significant coarctation is defined as a peak-to-peak gradient >20 mmHg across the coarctation in the absence of significant collateral circulation. While this type of diagnostic testing was frequently used in the past, it is now primarily reserved for intervention or where additional hemodynamic information is required.55,65

Conclusion

CoA is a complex lifelong heterogeneous disease process with multiple associated complications both with and without treatment. Although significant advances in the recognition and treatment of patients with CoA have taken place, continued and aggressive screening and management of patients with CoA are vital. Follow-up needs to include thorough evaluation for late complications, including systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease, recurrent obstruction, and aneurysm formation. Given the limitation of clinical examination and echocardiography alone, advanced imaging techniques, including CMR or CTA, are necessary. A thorough evaluation is particularly important whenever systemic hypertension is present to ensure that recoarctation or residual stenosis is not present. Treatment, if necessary, should be performed in centers with extensive experience with CoA.

References

  1. Hoffman JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: I Postnatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol 1995;16:103–13.
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Sable C, Foster E, Uzark K, et al. Best practices in managing transition to adulthood for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the transition process and medical and psychosocial issues: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:1454–85.
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Perloff, Joseph K. Clinical Recognition of Congenital Heart Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1994;775.
  4. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890–900.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2915–57.
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. McBride KL, Pignatelli R, Lewein M. Inheritance analysis of congenital left ventricular outflow tract obstruction malformations: segregation, multiplex relative risk, and heritability. Am J Med Genet A 2005;134A:180–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. McBride KL, Riley MF, Zender GA, et al. NOTCH1 mutations in individuals with left ventricular outflow tract malformations reduce ligand-induced signaling. Hum Mol Genet 2008;17:2886–93.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Sehested J. Coarctation of the aorta in monozygotic twins. Br Heart J 1982;47:619–20.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Wessels MW, van de Laar IM, Roos-Hesselink J, et al. Autosomal dominant inheritance of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Am J Med Genet A 2005;134A:171–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Connolly HM, Huston J 3rd, Brown RD Jr, et al. Intracranial aneurysms in patients with coarctation of the aorta: a prospective magnetic resonance angiographic study of 100 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:1491–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Kenny D, Hijazi ZM. Coarctation of the aorta: from fetal life to adulthood. Cardiol J 2011;18:487–95.
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Qureshi SA. Use of covered stents to treat coarctation of the aorta. Korean Circ J 2009;39:261–3.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Ward KE, Pryor RW, Matson JR, et al. Delayed detection of coarctation in infancy: implications for timing of newborn follow-up. Pediatrics 1990;86:972–6.
    PubMed
  14. Steffens JC, Bourne MW, Sakuma H, et al. Quantification of collateral blood flow in coarctation of the aorta by velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1994;90:937–43.
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S. Collateral circulation in aortic coarctation shown by 64 channel multislice computed tomography angiography. Heart 2005;91:1422.
    Crossref | PubMed
  16. Perloff J, Child J, Aboulhosn J. Congenital Heart Disease in Adults. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2008.
  17. Webb G. Treatment of coarctation and late complications in the adult. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;17:139–42.
    Crossref | PubMed
  18. Crafoord C, Nyhlin G. Congenital coarctation of the aorta and its surgical treatment. J Thorac Surg 1945;14:347–61.
  19. von Kodolitsch Y, Aydin MA, Koschyk DH, et al. Predictors of aneurysmal formation after surgical correction of aortic coarctation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:617–24.
    Crossref | PubMed
  20. Feltes TF, Bacha E, Beekman RH 3rd, et al. Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:2607–52.
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Kische S, D’Ancona G, Stoeckicht Y, et al. Percutaneous treatment of adult isthmic aortic coarctation: acute and long-term clinical and imaging outcome with self-expandable uncovered nitinol stent. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e001799.
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to develop guidelines on the management of adults with congenital heart disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:e143–263.
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Bouchart F, Dubar A, Tabley A, et al. Coarctation of the aorta in adults: surgical results and long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1483–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Lock JE, Bass JL, Amplatz K, et al. Balloon dilation angioplasty of aortic coarctations in infants and children. Circulation 1983;68:109–16.
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Turner DR, Forbes TJ. Interventional therapy for coarctation of the aorta. Cardiac Interventions Today 2009:50–5.
  26. Butera G, Piazza L, Chessa M, et al. Covered stents in patients with congenital heart defects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:466–72.
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Isner JM, Donaldson RF, Fulton D, et al. Cystic medial necrosis in coarctation of the aorta: a potential factor contributing to adverse consequences observed after percutaneous balloon angioplasty of coarctation sites. Circulation 1987;75:689–95.
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. O’Laughlin MP, Slack MC, Grifka RG, et al. Implantation and intermediate-term follow-up of stents in congenital heart disease. Circulation 1993;88:605–14.
    Crossref | PubMed
  29. Mendelsohn AM, Lloyd TR, Crowley DC, et al. Late follow-up of balloon angioplasty in children with a native coarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:696–700.
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Forbes TJ, Kim DW, Du W, et al. Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta: an observational study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2664–74.
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Zabal C, Attie F, Rosas M, et al. The adult patient with native coarctation of the aorta: balloon angioplasty or primary stenting? Heart 2003;89:77–83.
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. Forbes TJ, Garekar S, Amin Z, et al. Procedural results and acute complications in stenting native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta in patients over 4 years of age: a multi-institutional study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:276–85.
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. Forbes TJ, Moore P, Pedra CA, et al. Intermediate follow-up following intravascular stenting for treatment of coarctation of the aorta. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:569–77.
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Gunn J, Cleveland T, Gaines P. Covered stent to treat co-existent coarctation and aneurysm of the aorta in a young man. Heart 1999;82:351.
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Ewert P, Schubert S, Peters B, et al. The CP stent -- short, long, covered -- for the treatment of aortic coarctation, stenosis of pulmonary arteries and caval veins, and Fontan anastomosis in children and adults: an evaluation of 60 stents in 53 patients. Heart 2005;91:948–53.
    Crossref | PubMed
  36. Kenny D, Margey R, Turner MS, et al. Self-expanding and balloon expandable covered stents in the treatment of aortic coarctation with or without aneurysm formation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:65–71.
    Crossref | PubMed
  37. Tan JL, Mullen M. Emergency stent graft deployment for acute aortic rupture following primary stenting for aortic coarctation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65: 306–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. Tsai SF, Hill SL, Cheatham JP. Treatment of aortic arch aneurysm with a NuMED-covered stent and restoration of flow to excluded left subclavian artery: perforation and dilation of e-PTFE can be done! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:385–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Chen SS, Donald AE, Storry C, et al. Impact of aortic stenting on peripheral vascular function and daytime systolic blood pressure in adult coarctation. Heart 2008;94:919–24.
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Lam YY, Kaya MG, Li W, et al. Effect of endovascular stenting of aortic coarctation on biventricular 392 function in adults. Heart 2007;93:1441–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Tzifa A, Ewert P, Brzezinska-Rajszys G, et al. Covered Cheatham-platinum stents for aortic coarctation: early and intermediate-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1457–63.
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. Chakrabarti S, Kenny D, Morgan G, et al. Balloon expandable stent implantation for native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta – prospective computed tomography assessment of stent integrity, aneurysm formation and stenosis relief. Heart 2010;96:1212–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  43. Pedra CA, Fontes VF, Esteves CA, et al. Use of covered stents in the management of coarctation of the aorta. Pediatr Cardiol 2005;26:431–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  44. Tanous D, Collins N, Dehghani P, et al. Covered stents in the management of coarctation of the aorta in the adult: initial results and 1-year angiographic and hemodynamic follow-up. Int J Cardiol 2010;140:287–95.
    Crossref | PubMed
  45. Canniffe C, Ou P, Walsh K, et al. Hypertension after repair of aortic coarctation: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:2456–61.
    Crossref | PubMed
  46. Kaemmerer H, Hager A, Hess J. Coarctation of the aorta in adults. SA Heart 2007;4:4–12.
    Crossref
  47. Vriend JW, Zwinderman AH, de Groot E, et al. Predictive value of mild, residual descending aorta narrowing for blood pressure and vascular damage in patients after repair of aortic coarctation. Eur Heart J 2005;26:84–90.
    Crossref | PubMed
  48. Hager A, Kanz S, Kaemmerer H, et al. Coarctation Long-term Assessment (COALA): significance of arterial hypertension in a cohort of 404 patients up to 27 years after surgical repair of isolated coarctation of the aorta, even in the absence of restenosis and prosthetic material. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:738–45.
    Crossref | PubMed
  49. Connelly MS, Webb GD, Somerville J, et al. Canadian consensus conference on adult congenital heart disease 1996. Can J Cardiol 1998;14:395–452.
    PubMed
  50. Adams EE, Davidson Jr WR, Swallow NA, et al. Long-term results of the subclavian flap repair for coarctation of the aorta in infants. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2013;4:13–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  51. Pandey R, Jackson M, Ajab S, et al. Subclavian flap repair: review of 399 patients at median follow-up of fourteen years. Ann Thorac Surg 2006:81:1420–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  52. Choudary P, Canniffe C, Jackson DJ, et al. Late outcomes in adults with coarctation of the aorta. Heart 2015;101:1190–5.
    Crossref | PubMed
  53. Rao PS, Galagl O, Smith PA, et al. Five- to nine-year follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:462–70.
    Crossref | PubMed
  54. Niwa K, Perloff JK, Bhuta SM, et al. Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: light and electron microscopic analyses. Circulation 2001;103:393–400.
    Crossref | PubMed
  55. Forbes T, Matisoff D, Dysart J, et al. Treatment of coexistent coarctation and aneurysm of the aorta with covered stent in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Cardiol 2003;24:289–91.
    Crossref | PubMed
  56. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA guidelines on adult congenital heart disease: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2019;139:e637–e697.
    Crossref | PubMed
  57. Clarkson PM, Nicholson MR, Barratt-Boyes BG, et al. Results after repair of coarctation of the aorta beyond infancy: a 10 to 28 year follow-up with particular reference to late systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1481–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  58. Kenny D, Polson JW, Martin RP, et al. Hypertension and coarctation of the aorta: an inevitable consequence of developmental pathophysiology. Hypertens Res 2011;34:543-7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  59. Cohen M, Fuster V, Steele PM, et al. Coarctation of the aorta. Long-term follow-up and prediction of outcome after surgical correction. Circulation 1989;80:840–5.
    Crossref | PubMed
  60. Roifman I, Therrien J, Ionescu-Ittu R, et al. Coarctation of the aorta and coronary artery disease: fact or fiction? Circulation 2012;126:16–21.
    Crossref | PubMed
  61. Cook SC, Hickey J, Maul TM, et al. Assessment of the cerebral circulation in adults with coarctation of the aorta. Congenit Heart Dis 2013;8:289–95.
    Crossref | PubMed
  62. Wu MH, Chen HC, Kao FY, et al. Risk of systemic hypertension and cerebrovascular accident in patients with aortic coarctation aged >60 years (from a national database study). Am J Cardiol 2015;116:779–84.
    Crossref | PubMed
  63. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10.
    Crossref | PubMed
  64. Strafford MA, Griffiths SP, Gersony WM. Coarctation of the aorta: a study in delayed detection. Pediatrics 1982:69:159–63.
    PubMed
  65. Karaogmanoglu AD, Khawaja RD, Onur MR, et al. CT and MRI of aortic coarctation: pre- and post-surgical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015:204:W224–33.
    Crossref | PubMed
  66. Holzer R, Qureshi S, Ghasemi A, et al. Stenting of aortic coarctation: acute, intermediate, and long-term results of a prospective multi-institutional registry – Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;76:553–63.
    Crossref | PubMed
  67. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Hoyer MH, et al. Recurrent coarctation: is surgical repair of recurrent coarctation of the aorta safe and effective? Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1923–30.
    Crossref | PubMed